# Pixel Shift vs Regular Capture - quick comparison w S1R

**URL:** <https://forums.negativelabpro.com/t/pixel-shift-vs-regular-capture-quick-comparison-w-s1r/8358>\
**Category:** Digital Camera Scanning\
**Created:** [October 24, 2024, 10:09pm UTC](https://forums.negativelabpro.com/t/pixel-shift-vs-regular-capture-quick-comparison-w-s1r/8358 "2024-10-24T22:09:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 49

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f6c823/32.png) [@Harry](https://forums.negativelabpro.com/u/Harry)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2024, 7:41am UTC](https://forums.negativelabpro.com/t/pixel-shift-vs-regular-capture-quick-comparison-w-s1r/8358/49 "2024-11-05T07:41:54Z")

</div>

An investigation across 2 articles on pixel-shift, but for Canon R5 rather than Panasonic. It seems that Canon have abandoned their in-camera 9-shot High Res version for the R5 MkII and replaced it with in-camera AI upsizing. Includes a lot of examples which seem to demonstrate how this is a mistake.

> **[Canon R5 Mk ii Drops Pixel Shift High Res. – Is Canon Missing the AI Big...](https://kguttag.com/2024/08/22/canon-r5-mk-ii-drops-pixel-shift-high-res-is-canon-missing-the-ai-big-picture/)**
>
> Sometimes, companies make what seems, on the surface, technically poor decisions. I consider this the case with Canon’s new R5 Mark ii (and R1) dropping support for sensor Pixel Shifting High…

> **[Canon R5 Mk ii In-Camera (Dumb) Upscaling Versus R5’s Pixel Shift (Part 2)](https://kguttag.com/2024/08/30/canon-r5-mk-ii-in-camera-dumb-upscaling-versus-r5s-pixel-shift-part-2/)**
>
> In my last article, Canon R5 Mk ii Drops Pixel Shift High Res. Is Canon Missing the AI Big Picture? I showed how IBIS High Resolution was useful in improving resolution and reducing moiré/aliasing.…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.negativelabpro.com/t/pixel-shift-vs-regular-capture-quick-comparison-w-s1r/8358)._
