Thanks and apologies for the delay. Here are the negs SOOC and an image of my light source.
This looks like light bleed due to the negative not being held perfectly flat in the film carrier. Additionally, the thinner the negative (exposure), the more likely you will see such fog. Try bracketing your exposure in 1/3 stop increments, using 100% full manual exposure control (FIXED ISO, shutter speed, aperture). Find the exposure that works best for most of your scans, and use that for entire rolls. Maybe fudge it a half stop or so for very thick, or very thin negatives.
It also helps to mask off the light source completely, so only the light going through the film is available to the lens. Dim the light in the room. Surround the space between the negative and the lens with black velcro or velvet material to absorb stray light. Use a film holder that keeps the film perfectly flat during exposure. All these strategies can help avoid the problem you see.
When all else fails, the vignette tools in LrC can help hide the effect.
1 Like
Many thanks for the help.
What’s interesting is that when I scan my 35mm on my 120 holder (so that I can include the sprockets) I don’t get this light leak.
That is puzzling.
Another issue I’ve seen is with old negatives (in my case, Fujicolor 200 and Vericolor II from the mid-1970s), where the dyes have faded unevenly, and color balance shifts from the center of the frame to the edge. It’s a pain. Some frames show very irregular shifts in color, while other frames don’t.
Had a look at your captures in B&W and DxO PhotoLab. Any other app would do too.
-The upper row shows the source images in B&W, the backlight image has been enhanced.
-The lower row shows the enhanced backlight again and manual conversions by tone-curve-flip.
Taking a look at things, we can notice that…
- the backlight image shows some de-centred vignetting.
- the backlight image shows reduced brightness in a band near the lower RH corner
- the landscape parts of the two LH negatives are fairly thin, check the selected negative
- the landscape parts of the two RH negatives are denser compared to the LH negatives
- the two LH positives show brightened corners at their lower edges
- the two RH positives have good contrast and detail rendering
My take
- Darkened corners (supposed cause: lens setup) as seen in the backlight image make NLP render brightened corners with thin negatives, but not with denser negatives
- NLP stretches tonal range (widens the histogram) in order to present a “decent” conversion. NLP has to stretch images with narrow histograms more than those with wider histograms. And the closer the histogram is to the left, the less numeric values can be used and errors get bigger by the stretching.
Steps we can take to improve the situation:
- Increase exposure, specially with low contrast negatives, try bracketing and HDR
- Get rid of vignetting caused by the setup or try to fix it in post with a radial mask
Looks to me like uneven backlight not noticeable on smaller 35mm negs. However, the brightness falloff towards the corners (or from the centre) becomes more of an issue with medium format negs. I have experienced it myself. Maybe the enhancement sheet hot-spotting like a lenticular projection screen?
1 Like
Yes, as I said above, these ‘enhancement’ sheets may be contributing, best to test without and compare.
Or maybe it’s the CS-LITE itself? Try moving it sideways?
This could also be the source of your problem... if the diffused light source is too far away from the film, the center parts of the film will receive more light than the edges… the areas receiving less light will then appear brighter and oranger when flipped.
This would explain why flipping the image still produces the same issue in the same place.
This might only be noticeable on thinner negatives (since it will get stretched more by NLP).
As an experiment, try taping your film negative directly to your light table (you can also add a mask to block out surround light from the light table). This will let us see if it is the Valoi holder causing the issue.
Another thing you can check is to make sure your aperture is f8 or higher and that you have lens correction turned on in Lightroom with the appropriate lens selected.
-Nate
Thanks all.
I tried removing the light sheet and I’m still experiencing the vignette. I will try Nate’s experiment next.
Hi Nate, taping the neg right to the light box resulted in slightly better vignetting, but its still there.
Is it safe to say it’s the light box + holder?
Edit: realizing now I should have test this with the same image above for comparison.
To me the first of these images shows that ‘the effect’ extends beyond the image area into the film border, as it did before you removed the LiteBrite sheets so whatever is causing it seems to be independent of them.
However what is the second image please? If it is the panel on its own what are the precise details regarding how you photographed it?
Good call. Yep, second photo is the light source shot at 100 iso, f/8, shutter auto on Nikkor Micro 55m.